A widely-spread email entitled "If George W. was an idiot?" is full of inaccuracies, half-truths, and innuendo. The anonymous email is being distributed as fact to thousands of websites, blogs, and individual emails despite having no byline, attribution, or source citations. Here is a detailed response to most of the allegations in the email, with help from Media Matters Action Network.
"If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan’s holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?"
It's untrue that President Obama "gave the unions a majority stake in GM." According to the May 27, 2009 Wall Street Journal, "General Motors Corp. and the United Auto Workers agreed to a new restructuring plan that would give the union a significantly smaller stake in the company than previously envisioned..." This agreement was worked out between GM and the UAW, not by the president, who made the decision earlier in the year to rescue the company from bankruptcy. It's also not true that the Obama "reduced {your?} retirement plan's holdings of GM stock by 90 percent." GM stock declined in value because the company was going bankrupt, not because of anything the president did. The stock went from more than $40 a share in October 2007 to under $4 on the last day of trading BEFORE Obama took office. So the 90 % decline happened under Bush, not Obama. The stock (it's now called Motors Liquidation Company) is now trading for 75 cents a share now, but could be zero if the government had let it go under. (Source: http://www.factcheck.org/).
If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?
Yes, the gift of 25 classic American movies the president gave Britain's Prime Minister Gordon Brown were on DVDs formatted on the American video standard, but did you know that George W. Bush had done EXACTLY THE SAME THING in 2004 when he gave the Queen of England an incorrectly-formatted DVD movie in 2004? (See http://intotheunknown.co.uk/2009/04/ukgov-announces-wholly-british.html).
If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?
It's untrue that the president gave the Queen of England an iPod "containing videos of his speeches." Instead, the iPod was loaded with video footage and photos of THE QUEEN on her 2007 official trip to the U.S.
If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved?
Conservatives have derided the President for allegedly bowing to the King of Saudi Arabia. The White House says that it was not a bow, but whether it was or was not, how did you react when George Bush actually KISSED the Saudi King? Check these images out here.
Were you upset? Did you protest? (For more information on the cozy personal and financial relationship between the oil-rich Bush family and the Saudi family, read investigative reporter Craig Unger's book, "House of Bush: House of Saud" (http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbninquiry.asp?ean=9780743253390
If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to "Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the fourth of May (Cuatro de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?
You claim that President Obama made a mistake when speaking Spanish. It appears that he was making a joke about the holiday being observed on the fourth of May at the White House, and immediately pronounced "Cinco de Mayo" correctly afterwards.
If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the non-existent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?
In visiting Austria, President Obama said "I don't know what the term is in Austrian." This may have been a slip-up, but it may have been, as one Austrian writer said, Obama’s attempt not to offend Austrians as referring to their language as German. Nonetheless, how did you react when President Bush addressed Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi in Spanish? You will note that Italians do not speak Spanish. (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/10/science/earth/10notebook.html?ref=world )
If George W. Bush had mis-spelled the word advice would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as proof of what a dunce he is?
You state that President Obama did not spell the word "advice" correctly. This is debatable. I found it very unlikely that a graduate of Harvard Law School and author of two best-selling books would make this mistake, so I did some research on this and found the copy of the letter the president wrote a concerned citizen. The "c" in advice looks somewhat like an "s," but in enlarging the word it looks like a "c" to me (see image of letter).
Who was claiming a "media cover-up of Obama's spelling error"? (It's not surprising that these chain emails attacking Obama rarely cite sources or reveal their source material, because to do so would expose that the charges come from a biased viewpoint.) I found that the source of this charge came from the Media Research Center, a right-wing conservative organization founded by Brent Bozell III. Media Matters describes L. Brent Bozell III as "a zealot of impeccable right-wing pedigree (see http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/outthere/otmeltdown.html). Regardless of whether you believe that the word was not spelled correctly, one thing is not debatable -- you can't spell "misspell" correctly!
If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?
When referencing the Special Olympics, Barack Obama made a joke about himself on a late-night comedy show. His joke hadn't even aired when he called the chairman of the Special Olympics board to apologize for comparing his bad bowling skills to Special Olympics (ABC News). Did George W. apologize for offending more than 90 percent of the world's population when he said this: "Perhaps freedom is not universal. Maybe it's only Western people that can self-govern. Maybe it's only, you know, white-guy Methodists who are capable of self-government." (George W. Bush, London, June 16, 2008). Come to think of it, did George W. apologize for any of his numerous offensive remarks?
President Obama has made a few gaffes so far, but President Bush during his eight years in office misspoke hundreds of time. Here is a compilation: http://www.slate.com/id/76886/ In one of his misstatements, he called Africa "a nation that suffers from incredible disease." (My six year-old knows that Africa is not a country, but a continent!) Did you send out emails to your friends every time Bush said something truly idiotic?
If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how he inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?
Again, you are incorrect in stating President Obama was the first president to install and use a teleprompter at a press conference. George Bush used a teleprompter. Oh yeah, Ronald Reagan also used a teleprompter. Check out these images here. Unlike these two presidents, however, Barack Obama has written and edited many of his own speeches.
If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans , would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?
Your email notes that more people were killed by floods in the Midwest than died as a result of Hurricane Katrina. I looked it up and it just is not true. Of the many storms in the Midwest in 2009, the highest death toll thus far is 36 confirmed deaths. http://prod.newsday.com/flash-flood-warning-issued-for-louisville-area-1.1347443 In comparison, there were 1,836 confirmed deaths caused by Hurricane Katrina. http://www.dhh.louisiana.gov/offices/page.asp?ID%3D192%26Detail%3D5248. Again, you just can't seem to get your facts straight in your vendetta against Barack Obama, but hey, maybe if you get enough like-minded people to pass on these untruths without checking into anything, maybe they'll believe them!
If George W. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved?
False again. President Obama inherited an economy in disarray and since taking office, has aimed to drastically revamp our nation's failing health care system and our crumbling infrastructure. I was curious to see how the national debt changed during the Bush years and according to the unaffiliated website PolitiFact.com, "When Bush took office; the national debt was $5.73 trillion. When he left, it was $10.7 trillion." http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/jan/22/rahm-emanuel/5-trillion-added-national-debt-under-bush/. When he took office, Obama not only faced the fallout from the worst economic downturn in 30 years, but also inherited this massive debt. One Republican, David M. Walker -- who served under George W. Bush -- said this: "There's no question in my view that Bush was the most fiscally irresponsible president in the history of the Republic...Obama was handed a bad deck."
Since you seemed concerned over wasteful spending did you know that billions of dollars were wasted during the Bush administration, particularly in massive contracts given out to private contractors that operate in Iraq and Afghanistan: According to one commission set up to investigate the use of private contractors, "billions of dollars of that amount ended up wasted due to poorly defined work orders, inadequate oversight and contractor inefficiencies. In one example, defense auditors challenged KBR after it billed the government for $100 million in costs for private security even though the contract prohibited the use of for-hire guards."
http://www.usatoday.com/news/military/2009-06-08-report-dod-spending_N.htm
I hope that we are always critical of those we elect, but I see that you are not being consistent or fair in your criticism. Your complaints about President Obama are ironic, given the fact that President Bush did in fact make so many similar and even more egregious mistakes and made them much more often. Have you heard that expression: People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
Sure, not all of the topics were covered, but most of them are.
Some points that were not included:
If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?
"On the June 1 edition of Fox News' Special Report, reporting on the Obamas' May 30 personal visit to New York City, anchor Bret Baier stated that according to a May 31 New York Post article promoted by Internet gossip Matt Drudge, "aircraft expenses for the date cost you at least $24,000." Prior to his report, Baier promoted the story in two teasers, each of which highlighted the cost of the trip. But like Drudge and the Post, at no point did Baier note that such use of taxpayer funds for private travel by the first family is typical; former President George W. Bush, for example, reportedly used Air Force One for trips to his ranch in Crawford, Texas, which he reportedly visited 77 times over the course of his eight years in office."
Media Matters
If George W. Bush had stated that there were 57 states in the United States, would you have said that he is clueless?
It was a joke. Get over it. Sheesh. As a child, I know it felt like there were 57 states, seeing as how many we drove through while traveling in the summer. Imagine a campaign trail.
If George W. Bush would have flown all the way to Denmark to make a five minute speech about how the Olympics would benefit him walking out his front door in Texas, would you have thought he was a self important, conceited, egotistical idiot?
Obama wanted to bring the Olympics to the United States; Chicago had been chosen by the Olympic Committee BEFORE Obama had taken office. It's not like Obama was trying to make Chicago a "new" location for his convenience.
If George W. Bush had created the position of 32 Czars who report directly to him, bypassing the House and Senate on much of what is happening in America, would you have approved?
I have a link, explaining czars. ""Czar" is a label bestowed by the media – and sometimes the administration – as a shorthand for the often-cumbersome titles of various presidential advisers, assistants, office directors, special envoys and deputy secretaries. (After all, what makes for a better headline – "weapons czar" or "undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics"?)" If you click on the PDF file, you will see: Bush had 35 "czars" and Obama has 32. FactCheck.org
One day, I will write a "If you think Obama is an idiot..." response... or I'll have the husband do it for me. :)
I am just tired of all the hateful, intolerant lies that are being spread throughout the United States in attempt to "get our country back."
Get our country back from what? A non-US born Muslim with black skin?
In the wise words of my late "second mom," Sue:
Life isn't fair and you don't always get what you want.